In My Opinion...............

A Warm Dedication. Gun Control.

Home.
A Warm Dedication. Gun Control
What Is A Christian? Homosexuality. Capital Punishment. Right To Worship.
Computers. Drunkeness. Immigration. Church. & Privacy.
Christmas.
Marriage. Abortion. & Where Is This Headed?
Are We Alone?
Getting There. Drinking.
Dog Tags. Bush Is Nuts/ Is Bush The Anti-Christ?
I Am Jonah. The Flag.
This Should Apply Here.
Troubles Between Parents And Kids.
The Big Debate.
A Link??????
Freedom To Facism. Freedom Of What?
Favorite Links.
Contact Me.
My Video Page
Blank page

nick.jpg

Nicholas P. “Nick” Rohr

August 16, 1922----August 22, 2008

GOODBYE!

Upon receiving word of my grandfathers passing, I was prompted to reflect on the man, and I have to say in all honesty and with much embarrassment, that I know so little of him.

As a child I was not allowed or encouraged to spend much time around my grandpa Nick. He and my dad did not get along very well so I did not have much opportunity to really talk to him and get to see the various aspects of his personality as I did my other grandparents.

Much to my shame, I did not see him much on my own after my family split. I did not really know how to approach him and really talk to him. I wanted to, but did not know how. I felt as though he was sort of unapproachable. To me, I was not doing anything in my life that he would be interested in or be proud of. I figured I would be an intrusion. So I just stayed away.

As the years went on I still had the desire to see him, and in fact I did a few times, but he was starting to have health problems. I did not want to be in the way so I kept my visits sporadic at best.

All those years I wasted because I felt as though I would be a nuisance, or I felt as though he would not be interested in my life. And only now do I see how I wasted that time. I always felt a desire to be around him, but was to insecure to follow up on it and now I have to live with the fact the chances I had to get to know him are forever gone.

I am a very insecure person when it comes to family. I always feel as though I do not measure up. And I wasted so much time feeling as though I would be a bother, that I threw away the opportunities I had to get to know my grandfather.

What I remember most about him was that he was proud to be a farmer. I know he was a very hard worker who did all he could to provide for his family. I know he was a loving husband as well as father. And I know he was a patriot who fought for, and suffered for his country in World War II.

As a kid I remember thinking that grandpa used to look like Glenn Ford. Interestingly enough Glenn was in WWII as well.

But the most poignant memory I have of my grandfather was during a visit he and my grandmother made to my parents house. He started talking about a few experiences he had in the war, and during the telling of those stories, I saw his eyes welling up with tears. It was the first and last time I ever saw him like that. I did not realize it then, but I was seeing a part of him that showed just how bad his experiences in the war had been. After that experience I rarely spoke of anything military around him. I did not want to upset him.

A few years ago, I asked the military for grandpa’s military records under the freedom of information act. I have yet to receive anything from them. But I did ask my grandmother if grandpa kept his dog tags. A few seconds later they were lying in my hands and the memories of those stories grandpa told me in my youth were fresh in my mind.

I copied all the information from those tags and had an exact copy made which I hung around a picture I have of him in uniform. I then wrote an article about him stating statistics about the battle and how proud I am of him. Then I posted the article on my websites on the internet. As a matter of fact the article is titled Dog Tags and is on this site.

As I studied about the Battle of the Ardennes (the battle of the bulge) I started to get a better sense of the man and the sacrifices he made in the service to this country. But it was a bitter-sweet experience because I realized that I could have done all this twenty years ago and forged a better bond with my granddad.

Death is not only about losing a loved one. Loss has a bitter backlash in remembering things that could have been said or done, but never were. The old saying “you never really know what you had until it’s taken from you” is true in a sense. But in remembering what you wanted to do or say that you never got around to, can stick with a person long after the pain of the initial loss.

I would encourage anyone and everyone to try to close the gap between them and those close, or at least related to them. I have many cousins, aunts, and uncles from Nick and Martina’s side of the family that I never really got to know. When childhood was over we all kind of went our separate ways and some of us were kept out of the loop or volunteered to stay out. Others were close and remain so to this day.

Don’t let loss be your only reason for thinking about your family.

Geoff Kuhn.

Sunday, August 24th 2008

GUN CONTROL

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. “

Thomas Jefferson

 

Earlier, I was reading a mini biography on Sylvester Stallone and I was floored by an anti- gun comment he made.

[Talking about the proliferation of guns in the U.S., following the murder of Phil Hartman in 1998, who was shot to death by his wife] “Until America, door to door, takes every handgun, this is what you're gonna have. It's pathetic. It really is pathetic. It's sad. We're living in the Dark Ages over there. It has to be stopped, and someone really has to go on the line, a certain dauntless political figure, and say, "It's ending, it's over, all bets are off." It's not 200 years ago, we don't need this any more, and the rest of the world doesn't have it. Why should we?”

I am so tired of all the people in this country who are blaming this countries woes on handguns. There are so many people who want firearms banned because they blame the loss of life on the weapon. In actuality, the weapon is merely a scapegoat.

A handgun is a tool, just like a tire iron. A pistol or rifle is useless without someone in control. I can put my tire iron on a wheel and wait, but the tool will not loosen the lug nut without someone controlling it. By the same standard a fully loaded gun can not injure anyone without someone exerting force and pulling the trigger. The weapon is only a threat when it is in the wrong hands.

I believe it is total folly for anyone to think that we will ever be rid of firearms. First off there are so many guns in this country already that it would be futile for the government to try to collect them all. Not only would many be hidden, but I would be ready to bet that some sort of civil upheaval would come of it.

Also, so much of the economy is based on the sale and manufacturing of these weapons. If you remove just pistols from the American economy save for police and military, there would be many millions of dollars in lost revenue and thousands of people out of work.

People buy guns, replacement parts, powder, reloaders, and primers every day. People have their guns serviced daily. People take their weapons to ranges daily. People sell guns to pawn shops daily and people come into pawn shops and buy guns daily.

People hire trainers to learn how to properly use their weapons, people buy holsters, books, cleaning solutions, ammo boxes, targets, protective cases, and locks. All this and more generates revenue which helps the economy.

It is not the fault of the gun that it is used in a robbery or gang slaying. But it is total and complete hypocrisy for a government official to try to ban guns when he is protected by the guns his bodyguards are packing.

Or by an actor who’s movie career consists of movies where the starring character uses guns throughout the movie. Stallone has made more movies using the pistols he wants this nation to be rid of then not.

The simple and honest fact is that this nation needs guns. And we not only need them for self defense but as a large part of this countries revenue.

I know I mentioned just banning pistols, but why would the government stop there? Let’s now assume rifles are banned as well. Now this country’s population is in a tail spin because of millions in lost revenue, the citizens have no way to protect themselves and now we add another problem, game.

If the government bans pistols and rifles then we are going to have a deer problem. We will have a huge rabbit problem and pheasant, duck, and goose to name a few. I suspect that every type of game currently being hunted will experience a population explosion if not hunted to a certain degree. And hunting these animals with a bow will not be as effective.

Hunting not only provides food and revenue, it also controls the population of certain animals. Hunting keeps the ecosystem balanced. No hunting? there goes the delicate balance of things.

Of course the military will probably use deer, duck, pheasant, goose, and quail hunting as training.

However, it is irresponsible for this nation to try to ban guns to control violent behavior. That is like trying to cure bronchitis by taking the patients lungs out. Guns do not kill, people kill. And people do not use just guns to kill. They use their hands to strangle. People beat people with any sort of club, including the tire iron. A garrote is a strangling device made of piano wire, are we gonna ban broom handles and piano wire also?

What about knives, clubs, bricks, lumber, rocks, poisons, and etc? Is the USA going to try and ban everything that man uses to deprive someone of their life?

And as far as this comment from Stallone: “It's not 200 years ago, we don't need this any more, and the rest of the world doesn't have it. Why should we?” I think Dolf Lundgren hit him a few too many times making Rocky 4.

We are a democratic nation and this democratic nation was built on weapons usage, especially the gun. Russia, Germany, Asia, and Britain, are not Democratic nations and do not have a Constitution guaranteeing their people the right to keep and bear arms. I do not live over there so why be concerned with how they run things?

As a matter of fact, most of the signers of the Declaration and the Constitution came here to escape their own King and help the peoples over here establish a more democratic type of government then they had. And that system of government guaranteed the peoples of this nation that they had the right to keep and bear arms. "No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (Thomas Jefferson.) Notice the quote says “free man.” Not a soldier, but a free man.

Immigrants came from all over the world to forge this great nation and it could not have been accomplished without the firearm. And as I said earlier, removing firearms will not make the violence in this nation cease. As a matter of fact, the criminals who do not surrender their weapons and shells will be far better off in their pursuits with little or no resistance from the people they are terrorizing.

Maybe if the judicial system would enact the death penalty in all 50 states then the crime rate would drop. It sure could not hurt the economy to not build a new super max prison for convicted killers. It would not hurt the economy to not have to feed thousands of killers currently being housed in jail. It would certainly not hurt the economy if thieves and murderers currently thought twice about robbing a “quickie mart” and killing the clerk.

Keep the guns. Ice the killers on death row who are literally feeding off the economy like the pariah they are. Give it a few years then see where we are.

As far as Stallone, his quote, and the people in this nation who share in his opinion, they can say what they want because of the men and women who fought for the freedoms we enjoy, by using guns.

James Madison said it best. "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." Stallone’s quote came when he was living in England. One of the other countries whose government is afraid to trust it’s people with arms.

George Mason: "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."

George Orwell: "That rifle on the wall of the laborer’s cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.

Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States."

 

Enter supporting content here